| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. Can you feel the Ohmph? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Do you have any specific details?
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.08.03 12:03:00
|
2. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Heavy Assault Missiles flight time is still too low, increase it from 3 to 6 seconds and then we can have a proper look at the Damnation and Sacrilege.
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.08.01 22:01:00
|
3. Nosferatu and Khanid changes on the test server, new Blog by Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ok, basically a repost of points I've put in other threads, but seeing as this is the discussion thread now: Point 1. Nos needs a change, but this current proposal is overly complicated and hits the actual NOS ships (Curse/Pilgrim/Blood Raider)...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.31 09:27:00
|
4. On the Khanid mk II changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Deva Blackfire There is one reason against: nanoidiots. If you up their range you will see sacris permarunning mwd+scram around you and spamming missiles. Atm you need to get under 15km where you risk overheated web or ene...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.30 20:00:00
|
5. On the Khanid mk II changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Fendahl: I can understand the reasoning for certain bonuses to be for short range rocket etc only. What are your thoughts though on the range of them? Especially the tech 1 HAM's? And before anyone else starts waffling on about Javelin HAM's, the...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.30 17:08:00
|
6. On the Khanid mk II changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
On reflection, a bonus just to HAM's wouldn't be such a bad thing if the range of the T1 missiles were increased. I'm of the firm opinion that sub 15km is too short. Just a little eye opener for you all, here are the ratio's of max theoretical ra...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.30 11:57:00
|
7. Khanid is getting fixed, but what about laser ships? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I certainly wouldn't argue if the -laser cap use got changed to a cap recharge bonus instead. The crux of the issue is laser base cap being lowered to the point where we can use lasers and get the cap usage bonus changed. I would suggest something...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.30 00:27:00
|
8. Khanid is getting fixed, but what about laser ships? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Laser turret cap use down by 40-50%. Sawp the -laser cap use bonus for +10% per level to armour hp. Got to be a good thing.
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.29 23:53:00
|
9. Khanid MkII - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Seeing as HAM's have finally been brought to the fore by this change, they really ought to have their flight time increased to 5 seconds.
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.29 19:32:00
|
10. Amarr fixes - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is what I'd like to see. All laser weapons get their base cap need reduced by 40-50%. All Amarr ships with a -10% laser cap use per level bonus have that swapped for +10% Armour HP per level. Profit!
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.29 19:25:00
|
11. Khanid MkII - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
The more i look at it, the more I reckon Khanid ships need bonuses that apply to both missile and rocket tree's. And the Damnation could possibly use 6 launchers, mind you it might not if the Heavy missiles were bonused as well.
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.29 13:57:00
|
12. Khanid MkII - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Parallax Error on 29/07/2007 13:46:51 I don't understand why people who are "laser flying pilots" are so upset about this. I'm very much a laser orientated pilot ad I love the direction of the new Khanid ships. Please stop trying t...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.29 13:46:00
|
13. Khanid MkII - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Looking good so far, seems to be worth me training up missiles a bit more. Can you think about making the bonuses affect missiles as well as Rockets/HAM's. Khanid ships aren't that fast so getting into HAM range is an issue. Caldari missile ships...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.29 10:52:00
|
14. Repost of an important topic on another forum - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Leon Czolgosz Bits and pieces. Some fair points, however I can guarantee you that any attempt to introduce destructible Outposts will lead to more blobbing for the reasons I've already outlined. It's not a case of wanti...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.21 01:51:00
|
15. Repost of an important topic on another forum - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Parallax Error on 20/07/2007 19:45:54 In other words, what you want is all the kudos and plus points of being a "conquering alliance" without any of the downsides of holding space? You can't really expect to have your cake and eat ...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.20 19:45:00
|
16. Repost of an important topic on another forum - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Firstly, I disagree strongly with the idea of Outposts being destructible. Mainly because it will be a nightmare to balance and implement, if you make it too hard then it's not worth putting in and if you make it too easy then everyone will be doi...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.07.20 15:43:00
|
17. Heat - Did we really want/need it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Disclaimer: I haven't used heat yet on TQ, only on Sisi so things might have changed. Heat is a reasonable idea, I agree that the UI surrounding it could use some tweaking to improve functionality. My main complaint is that it seems to have been ...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.06.29 19:20:00
|
18. A proper welcome to EVE Online. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
When I looked at that page, I couldn't help but think rejected from Blue Peter.
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.06.21 14:45:00
|
19. Thank you Tuxford. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Maybe I'm coming down with some bizarre virus, but did someone in this thread turn round and say that the Armageddon is not the damage dealing Amarr Battleship? Oh my poor brain.
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.06.20 19:38:00
|
20. Thank you Tuxford. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Parallax Error on 20/06/2007 10:27:15 I love how every shouting stfu and adapt is missing the point. Even with these changes, the best 3 slot tank you can make is 2 x EANM (variant) and a Damage Control. Better overall resists and ...
- by Parallax Error - at 2007.06.20 10:28:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |